Wednesday, July 10, 2013

ALA Chicago 2013

As always, ALA had many sessions to attend, with many of them being at the same time. I went to a lot of talks. Below were my 3 favorites:

1. Annual Reference Research forum: http://connect.ala.org/node/207609
Presents 3 original research articles that were published this year. I found the first speaker's research very interesting.
Research Guides Usability Study- Angela Pashia & Andrew Walsh University of West Georgia
    • Has a Libguides for every subject offers a major in
      • Great for librarians- but would like students to use them too…they don’t. How to improve this.
        • What is frustrating the students?
        • When are they leaving the guides and googling it?
        • How to improve the design to get them to use it- did usability tests first & then focus groups
      Usability studies- 4 freshmen, 2 soph, 2 juniors, 1 senior, 1 grad student= 10 users; $5 gc to starbucks, pulled them in “off the street” on the fly. On average each one was about 10 minutes. Varied on how long it took them to complete the 3 tasks.
      • Fairly novice group with familiarity with resources
      • Used free CamStudio- screen capture software
      • Gave them tasks to complete- how would they find articles on education from the education libguide, how would they get help from a librarian from a libguide, how would they get back to the same libguide from the library’s homepage.
      • Made it clear, it was not a test on them but a test on the library
      Common issues:
      • They were using the libguides search box to look for articles- remove this box. Librarians like it, but it is confusing students.
      • Difficulty understanding the role of libguides in the research process; didn’t see the value added
      • Wasn’t sure what to click on when saw the list of databases- clicked on the more info link instead of the actual database link to get to it.
      • Trouble getting to a specific guide from the library homepage
      • Don’t see the tabs, Want more emphasis on the tabs.
  • Focus groups
    • Based on usability results, limited fgs to juniors and seniors. =who would need the libguides for subject specific research
    • What do the labels mean to them?- i.e. background information vs. encyclopedias. They wanted encyclopedias. Finding sources vs. finding articles, etc.
    • They loved the VCU rg homepage. (listed as best of in libguides) plus sign for all disciplines that open to subdisciplines.= systems librarian is going to model new homepage after this.
    • Future: Doing more focus groups with grad students
  • Google analytics: Libguides search data.Config special google anyaltics report.“goal completion” set up for search results page.Tracks this as an event and gives you the keywords in the URL string!
2. Conversation Starters: Achievement unlocked: Motivating and assessing user learning with digital badges 
3.  Two separate talks on "making" and "maker spaces." Cory Doctorow & Mark Frauenfelder
  • Decline of making and DIY 1970-2000. Cheaper to buy new than to fix. Change in popular mechanics mag covers. Went from things you can make yourself to skyscrapers and brain implants.
  • Rise of DIY subculture. 
  • 2000-2013 we are in a making rebirth, modern making movement; Make magazine established in 2005;
  • "Networked Making"- you don't start with a project that you read about in a magazine and try to build it. Instead if you an idea for something new. Look it up online and find someone who did it 80%...you figure out the remaining in online forums, communities etc. 
  • Maker fairs- playful side of making; Pinterest was created at a Maker Fair

Monday, June 10, 2013



2013 ABLD Meeting: Montreal
Notes
Session 1: Supporting new agendas with the application of technologies related to online teaching, learning, and research.
1.       Deb Wallace, Harvard Business School.
a.       Talked about an ongoing initiative whereby HBS has gone away from general blogging and tweeting to a more focused approach designed to highlight faculty and student achievements, activities (scholarly ones), publications, honors, etc.  The approach is journalistic.  They are aiming at “virality” by using clever tagging strategies, embedding links in highly visited places, etc.  The goal is to focus on a) increasing the stature of faculty and students, b) help faculty and students disseminate their scholarly work to a broad audience, and c) focusing strategies on those wider ex-university audiences for maximum impact.
b.      Special Collections Exhibits are being enhanced by QR codes to see full documents (digitized ) online;  exhibit on Augustine Heard & Co. during the China trade includes video footage of the Heard family home, the exhibit will be accompanied by an online flipbook.  The whole thing is going to be brought to China and exhibited.
c.       HBX Online Course Initiative.  HBS is designing and planning enhancements to the online course environment.  A team of 25 has been created for this.  They’re looking at tools such as Zotero feeds and “info blasts” to students.
d.      KLS Innovation Program.  This is a program to encourage innovation in the delivery of library services.  There’s an idea lab (seed money to text ideas), “Tool Time”—training in various IT tools over lunch (e.g., how to get the most out of SnagIt), and iAwards for small innovations.
e.      Business-at-the-Base-of-the-Pyramid (BBOP) Knowledge Center.  This online resource (http://www.library.hbs.edu/references/bbop/) is an adjunct to a course on this topic.  BBOP refers to the 4 billion consumers at the bottom of the consumption heap—the number of people is large, their needs are many for basic and affordable solutions, but they are under-targeted.  The website contains links to datasets, social network sites dedicated to this topic, and more.
2.       Jack Cahill, Babson College.
a.       This talk was also about online strategies, especially in support of online and blended courses.
b.      Babson has a “Jump Start” video intro to the library: access points, resources, how to ___, an introduction to the librarians, etc.
c.       All the online tools “distract students from the library,” a problem that must be addressed.
d.      Babson uses Blackboard.  Students are “living” on the Blackboard course sites, not the library website, so the library needs to be more visible from Blackboard.
e.      Babson uses Panopto for video capture, Brainshark for simple, easy-to-produce, voice-over slides, WebEx for webinars and conferencing, and Google Suite for collaboration tools.
f.        They use Genbook as an online appointment book for students seeking research help (accessible via QR Code).  Students can choose times themselves, whom to meet with, in person or WebEx, topic, contact info.  The number of appointments is up and the number of no-shows is down.
3.       Wahib Nasrallah, University of Cincinnati—DDA (i.e., PDA), the Basics (e-books)
a.       Cincinnati keeps track of publishers who don’t publish e-books, and focuses its print buying on those companies, proactively.
b.      They also identify companies that charge more for e-books versus print books
c.       He feels students and faculty are as good at selecting what they need/want to read as are the librarians.
d.      He gets good usage stats.
e.      Data cannot be tracked by fund code.
f.        He has greatly reduced his print buying and greatly increased his e-book buying.
4.       Thorsten Meyer, Leibnitz Information Centre for Economics, Kiel, Germany.  Social media shaping research and publication processes.
a.       Researchers now “coming up” are changing continually from past practices.
b.      People announce their new publications on Twitter.
c.       Students are using Facebook as their source for both news/current events AND scientific research.
d.      Social networking use measurements tell more, more accurately, than surveys do.
Session 2: Pecha Kucha Sesson: 20 slides for 20 seconds per slide.
1.       Jessica Lange, McGill University.
a.       Has business info resources FAQs in her LibGuide.
b.      Keeps track of all new faculty hires and proactively reaches out and meets with all those willing to meet, in order to tell them about library services, reserves, etc.
c.       She sends out lots of informational, explanatory, and introductory emails to faculty and students.
d.      She has been allowed to insert a widget into all Blackboard class spaces with her face, contact information, etc.
2.       Bob Hebert, Wake Forest University
a.       Computer labs are passé.  Everyone uses laptops and has remote access to most resources.
b.      The Wake Forest Business School is considering a Business Information Center or Commons—readily available Bloomberg terminals, study rooms, offices, librarians, but no books.
3.       Jim Fries, Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College
a.       Students didn’t engage with LibGuides unless actively assisted by librarians
b.      Problem with online courses: large/significant deliverables often due on Sundays.
c.       They use Blackboard, Adobe Connect, Echo 360.
d.      Business librarians have had to learn to search in PubMed to better serve their patrons.
e.      Tuck has a “Master of Health Care Delivery Science (MHCDS)” degree.  There are 5 librarians embedded in teams, has an online component with students from many time zones, which is a challenge.
4.       Alicia Estes, NYU.
a.       “NYU Shorts”—videos that support their online “Global Network University.”
b.      NYU has schools in various countries, including full libraries (with librarians) in 12 countries that serve the local student populations.  There is no “call in” to NYU from other locations.  Remote librarians are trained using videos, e-mail, and Adobe Connect-style meetings.
c.       Use the ADDIE system to design instructional encounters.
d.      Their online guide is called the “Virtual Business Library.”  The homepage is VERY stripped down and simple.  Linked from homepage is a series of video tutorials about the Bobst Library and its resources.
5.       Meg Trauner, Duke University
a.       Conducted a book format preference survey.
b.      Most students never use e-books, but it depends on the type of material and what it is for; content determines preferred format.
c.       Textbooks—print preferred.
d.      Popular business titles—Kindle preferred.
e.      Books about software (how to use it)—E-books preferred.
f.        Career development—50% Kindle, 50% print.
g.       Students don’t have dedicated e-readers.
h.      They purchased Kindle Paperwhites with top business books pre-loaded; these can be locked to prevent adding or removing content.  Included are business bestsellers, career collection, business classics—Each of these collections are on different Kindles, one collection to a Kindle.
i.         The service is marketed.
j.        Users still would prefer seamless downloading to their own devices.
6.       Jeffrey Archer, University of Chicago
a.       Saw need to increase librarian knowledge re: how to analyze/interpret business statistics (not necessarily datasets and SPSS, just how to understand statistical information).
b.      Hired a PhD student for $2,000 to teach 30 people over 8 sessions.  The sessions were somewhat helpful, but would be improved if homework was assigned (to ensure that librarians were really focusing on the material and learning it).
c.       There are plans to follow up with a business statistics MOOC.
Session 3: Interdisciplinary Librarian Services

1.       Kathy Long, Stanford University.  The Venture Studio within the Stanford Graduate School of Business is a new program to give space and support to graduate students trying to start a business.  Co-staffed by librarians from business and the engineering library, who developed a training session to teach students how to track product development and distribution.
2.       Alan Zuckerman (PowerPoint presentation about my experiences at East Baltimore/Welch Medical Library—PowerPoint presentation available.)
3.       Hilary Schiraldi, UC Berkeley. Described the “Cleantech to Market program (similar to Carey’s Discovery to Market course and the CBID program), and discussed  joint venture between the business and engineering librarians to teach information resources for the students.
4.       Michael Enyart, University of Wisconsin, Madison.  Described the Entrepreneurship Residential Learning Community.  Mostly comprised of first semester freshman.  This is a coordinated program co-sponsored with the university’s student residence office (who was challenged to contribute something significant to the students’ learning environment from a housing point of view).  Mike teaches a course in the residence halls about basic business concepts, but more importantly, research skills, marketing tools, and campus resources that will serve them during their time at the university.
Session 4: Major Themes and Overview Discussion
1.       Laura Leavitt, Michigan Statie University.  Expanding Role in Providing Access to Data.  This presentation focuses on the problems associated with licensing/use restrictions of databases in light of increasing requests for database use by tech transfer offices, students in case competitions, students in courses where they partner with real-world companies/entrepreneurs, students privately pursuing business ventures, etc.  The issues are the same as for JHU, with solutions just as murky given vendors’ unwillingness to rethink their licensing models.
2.       Steve Hayes, University of Notre Dame.  The University’s main library, the Hesburgh Libraries, was reorganized from the top down.  Positions were cut, spans of control were flattened, job descriptions were revised, etc.  Steve concludes that the jury is still out on whether things are worse than before.  There’s been resistance from various quarters within the library staff, there’s a need to reconnect communication channels to replace those that were severed.
Session 4: Presentations by faculty and staff of HEC Business School (Oldest Business School in Canada)
1.       Brief welcome by various HEC admin staff and the head librarian.  English facility limited in some cases, so presentations were short and scripted.
2.       Lecture by Christian Dussart, Professor, Department of Marketing, HEC Montreal (there’s a Paris branch as well).
a.       Marketing is no longer a separate discipline that can operate independently (e.g., market a single product line).  It must be combined with finance, technology, manufacturing, etc.
b.      He tailored his remarks for his librarian audience.
c.       His main topic was survival in our dynamic environment—reinventing our “business” model.
d.      He said that academic libraries need to be resilient and proactively involved in “the revolution.”  He quoted Richard Branson: “Screw business as usual.”  The “long term” is now 2-3 years.
e.      On the theme of resilience, he said that libraries need to simultaneously adapt their core functions and create new models at the same time.
f.        The digital revolution has broken many traditional links to our constituencies, our materials, our physical spaces.
g.       We cannot prevent people from using Wikipedia.
h.      The key phrase is “customer centric.”  We need to be able to read and map the “ecosystem,” which means we have to understand how our constituencies do things.  That takes a first-hand familiarity with the technologies they’re using, their communication channels, etc.  We need to study each technology: What does it do?  What is its impact?  What is its staying power?
i.         Updating the core involves digitizing our information.
j.        He suggests that libraries create a permanent Think Tank of people who can focus exclusively on generating, researching, testing, and implementing new ways of doing things—while others are keeping the core services going and improving.  Then the Think Tank system and the Core Services system (i.e., the people in each of these two areas) meet and coordinate on a planned, regular basis.

Monday, May 13, 2013

Maryland Library Association Conference, 2013, Ocean City, Maryland

I attended the joint Maryland Library Association/Delaware Library Association Conference in Ocean City, Maryland, May 8-10, and it was, as usual, a very enjoyable experience.  I've attached my notes for each session attended below.  I take these short snippets to remind myself, post-conference, of interesting things I intend to follow up on.  The session on GIS this year was especially follow-up-worthy.  Tahirah Akbar-Williams, Robin Sinn, and I gave a presentation, "Scholarly Metrics," which went over very well (if I do say so myself!).

MARK'S NOTES FROM MLA/DLA, 2013:

Wednesday, May 8
Keynote:  Lee Rainie, Director of the Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project.  Rainie's fascinating presentation provided an overview of a recent (Fall 2012) survey that the Pew organization conducted on library users' attitudes toward libraries and librarians, in particular, public libraries and librarians.  I'll not summarize what he said other than to say that the public confidence, trust, and satisfaction with libraries outshines any other American institution, including the military and the Presidency.  See for yourself, the full results are posted here:  http://libraries.pewinternet.org/2013/05/01/parents-children-libraries-and-reading/

Thursday, May 9
  9:00 - 10:15 Planning Social Media  [2]
University of Baltimore, Natalie Burclaff, Catherine Johnson
"Tweets, Posts, and Pins with a Purpose"
UBalt has NINE social media accounts!
Asked “why are we on social media?”
Anchored in Library’s mission statement
Created policies
Policy, implementation, goals, assessment
Policy should articulate your purpose
‘Quality matters”  “Use good judgment”  Copyright, FRPA, etc.  General guidelines
Then specific guidelines per social media technology
Your policies must work within your library’s culture
Implementation, policy in action
Stakeholder buy-in
UBalt has 12 Facebook admins!
All contributors must be on same page with respect to purpose and tone
Your actions should reflect your purpose
Goals, give support and direction toward purpose
Goals derived from Purpose
Goal:  Where are we going to go?
Objective:  How are we going to get there?
Strategy
SMART Objectives
Assessment:  Measures of success
Tools:  Google Analytics, Facebook Insights, Klout (influence metric; Klout score)
Pay attention to what the numbers MEAN.  The numbers themselves are value neutral without the larger narrative

Offline social media:  UBalt has a VERY popular bulletin board.  Markers, students writing on it, etc.


  10:45 - 12:00 SCVNGR Hunt  [3]
Towson University, Sarah Gilchrist and Kimberly Miller
SCVNGR iPhone and Android apps
Geolocation-based games in libraries
“gamification”  applying game-like concepts to non-game situations
Intrinsic and extrinsic rewards
Games in library committee at Towson
Challenges, tasks, rewards, treks (several challenges linked together)
Create SCVNGR account to create profile with builder
Build a Trek, then add Challenges to it
Jane McGonigal TED talks about games and gaming
New Media Consortium, gamed-based learning
College & Research Library News, article by Gilchrist and Miller
Lots of libraries doing this
T3 Research Lab (Text, Tags, and Trust) at UMD


  2:00 - 3:15 Mapping the Way for Maryland Students  [4]
Washington College, Stewart Bruce
68 student employees.  Largest Undergraduate GIS program in the US
Interns
78+ total staff
Strong interest in GIS for K-12.  3 week long program for high schoolers
State of Maryland, statewide license for ESRI software for K-12. 2.5 Million $
BUT not for libraries!
Stewart has 10 seats he can give to libraries, and he will train librarians
Alternatives to ESRI:  Google Earth; Trimble Sketchup Pro; Autodesk; Unity; MapStory
geoworkshops.org  Free GIS training
Working on NSF grant, 1.5 Million
Demonstration of Unity
3D VR space


  3:45 - 5:00 Scholarly Metrics  [6]
Johns Hopkins, Tahirah Akbar-Williams, Mark Cyzyk, Robin Sinn
“Simply [superb]!”
“...one of the two or three...”
“I couldn't believe [it]...”


Friday, May 10
  9:30 - 10:45 Technology Update  [2A]

Delaware Technical and Community College, Paul Page
Using Prezi
Can embed within Powerpoint
Telling stories, uses a single canvas rather than linear slides
Online community, sharing
Dynamic, accessed from the Cloud or download locally (must sign up, costs money if you want to download locally)
You can zoom in with Prezi
Illusion of movement
Use for information literacy instruction
Fade in backgrounds, 3D themes, background music and voiceovers
Steep learning curve
No image editing
Limited fonts
100 MB included with free cloud-based account

Delaware Public Archives, Dawn Mitchell
Outreach to non-genealogists/historians using social media
YouTube videos, award-winning.  90 second videos
Video clips from the Archives, 50 of them
WordPress blog to highlight resources
Facebook, This Day in Delaware History
Put archival photographs up on Web
Twitter, This Day in Delaware History, Photo of the Day, Document of the Day
Hootsuit – lets you pre-upload content for Tweets
Pinterest
“Delivery” a free tool that will push content out to multiple social media resources
Postcard collection, dumped entire collection into Flickr

University of Delaware, Meg Groti and Sarah Katz
QR codes integrated into program for freshmen
First Year Experience seminar
Students scan QR codes, learn about library via Webpages designed for cellphones
Gameplay workshops, 4000 incoming students
I-nigma QR reader app
“How to locate a book using a call number” ← always the most confusing task for new students
BeQRious – QR code generator, generates QR codes in different colors


  11:00 - 12:15 Become a WIZ at Dataviz  [3]
University of Baltimore, Lucy Holman and Michael Shockett
Communicate information with very simple charts
Visual perception:  serial processing, and pre-attentive processing
Pre-attentive processing:  Size shape orientation concavity/convexity
Small visuals that tell the story
Emphasize pre-attentive patterns
Jacques Bertin, visual variables
Position; Shape; Orientation; Color; Texture; Value; Size
What kind of data do you want to show?  Marry that with the appropriate variable
Edward Tufte:
Present data; Focus on content; Avoid distortion; Create coherence; Reveal at multiple levels; Be transparent
Small multiples help tell the story
Graphics must be proportional to the data
Clear and comprehensive labels
Watch out for distortion.  Good examples from Tufte!

--Mark Cyzyk

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Webwise 2013


I was at Webwise 2013. This year the format included more participatory and interactive sessions than usual. The theme was “Putting the Learner at the Center”. Sponsored by the IMLS (Institute of Museum and Library Services) and the CHNM (Roy Rozenzweig Center for History and New Media), the event offered many project sessions and preconference workshops as well as a keynote lecture and a Project/Partnership Incubator session.
 I attended  a presentation on Makerspaces. It was presented by  Nini Beegan, Carroll County Division of Library Development & Services; Lisa Brahms, Children’s Museum of Pittsburgh; David E. Kanter, New York Hall of Science; AnnMarie Thomas, Maker Education Initiative. Inspired by Hackerspaces, makerspaces are learning environments that can happen in libraries or  museums, among other places. The interdisciplinary projects are implemented through a program that includes five elements: networks, project libraries, tools, learning labs, training and support communities, hardware and software tools.
I also attended was Juggling all the Pieces, Project Management for Beginners, presented by Sharon M. Leon, Associate Professor at George Mason University and Director of Public Projects at the Center for History and New Media. The workshop focused on strategy and planning for successful management and mentioned the use of Basecamp.
Another workshop I attended was on Digital Preservation and was presented by Robert Horton, previously State Archivist for the State of Minnesota and currently Associate Deputy Director for Library Services at the IMLS. The workshop explored the benefits and costs of digital preservation as well as challenges posed by issues of authentication, data ingestion, migration and curation. Legal and policy aspects of the field were mentioned. Horton talked about various approaches, including the Digital Preservation Capability Maturity Model; the Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification (TRAC); the Library of Congress’ DPOE (Digital Preservation Outreach and Education) program; the CDL, California Digital Library’s UC3 Merritt repository service and its micro-services approach to data curation.
Apart from many other workshops, there was a Project/Partnership Incubator session in which people sat around tables with a facilitator and exchanged ideas of projects for their institutions, devising plans for implementation and for grant proposals (including crucial parts of planning such as identification of needs, audiences, stakeholders, etc.) Foster Zhang and I sat at the same table and mentioned ideas on digitization of brittle collections (like our library’s Schaechter gift) and on providing increased online access to the library’s collections in general.
The keynote speaker this year was free-lance writer Audrey Watters who posts on the Hack Education blog. In her talk, Whose Learning is it, Anyway? Watters reflected on technology and education, with thoughts on the links between use of computers in education, improv, and MOOC initiatives that, she reminded us, originated in artificial intelligence research.
Webwise was, as usual, a good opportunity to learn about trends, ideas and projects and meet professionals from various cultural institutions through the country.

Isabelle Kargon.

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Code4Lib 2013 from Jonathan Rochkind

I again attended the Code4Lib conference this year; it is typically the only conference I attend in a year, and I do attend it most years. It's a great opportunity to network and share information with other software engineers in libraries.

On the first day, I attended and presented at a pre-conference on libraries that have innovated in their web services around "delivery" -- that is, what happens after 'discovery'.  I presented on the Umlaut software that powers our Find It service; Umlaut is open source software for which I'm the chief developer.  The pre-conference demonstrated that there's a lot of interest in Umlaut at the moment -- several other libraries, including Princeton, are exploring using the Umlaut software themselves. And other libraries are developing their own alternative software inspired by Umlaut.  As we've been using Umlaut for 4 or 5 years now, I think we can take pride in being ahead of the curve in paying attention to improving the access/delivery experience in ways Umlaut/Find It are intended to.  As I've been trying to raise interest from other libraries in Umalut for several years, it's gratifying to see it starting to happen -- and will result in more sustainability for Umlaut as a software package, to get more involvement.

Once the conference itself began, one trend I noticed was many presentations about projects based on Blacklight. Blacklight is the open source project that our own Catalyst is based on.  Blacklight seems to be only gaining in popularity, which again is encouraging for the sustainable future of the Blacklight project.

Many of these Blacklight projects were 'digital repository' type projects.  Penn State and other institutions are developing a product called "ScholarSphere", which is based on Blacklight, Fedora, and Hydra (another open source project in the Blacklight eco system). ScholarSphere was impressive for having one of the best User Interfaces in an IR or 'digital repository' product I've seen.

In the past, I always liked Code4Lib for being just about the only conference on library technology that focused on innovation in what I'll call "research services" as opposed to "digital repository" services and products. Accross libraries, I think "digital repository" innovation receives a lot more attention, funding, and resources.  It was hard to find the people working on innovation in research services too, which I think is also very important but doesn't get sufficient attention.  However, this year, even at Code4Lib fewer presentations than usual were on tech innovations in traditional research services, and more on digital repository services. Lately I have started to wonder if it's simply too late for libraries to succesfully innovate in research services, maybe the future of libraries really is solely in digital repository services.

Also, when I first started going to Code4lib, almost all of my peers there were from similar situations to me, in terms of being one of only one or two developers in the library, sort of eeking out development of innovative web projects in their 'spare' time, amongst support of existing systems.  This year, it hit me that quite a few libraries have extensive development staff these days. I couldn't help but be envious of libraries that have 10 or more developers working on developing new software, along with a handful of additional User Expereience staff, and additional completely seperarate staff supporting legacy products like the ILS.  Here at JHU we manage to do an extraordinary amount of innovation with our relatively paltry development staff (1-4 developers depending on how you count, who are generally also responsible for extensive user support and legacy system support too) -- but it definitely makes me envious of how much we could accomplish and innovate if we had the resources of those peer institutions who have prioritized extensive software engineering staff resources (examples include U of Michigan, Stanford, and North Carolina State University).

All in all, the Code4Lib conference remains crucial to my professional skill and awareness of trends and possibilities in library technological innovation and relevant technologies.

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

MLA 2013

The Modern Languages Association annual convention in Boston this year featured lots of sessions about the digital humanities, scholarly communications, libraries and collections, book history, textual studies and editing, as well as the usual sessions focused on literary theories, thematics and histories. It was maybe one of the best conferences I have ever been to.

Highlights:
  • Loved the session on "The Literary Lab," even though it turned out to really be about DH center-type lab, not the laboratory as a paradigm for the classroom (which is why I went). 
  • A roundtable on "The Dark Side of the Digital Humanities" was the source of much subsequent debate. You can read a summary in the Chronicle here.
  • "The Digital Humanities and the Future of Scholarly Communication" included amazing talks by Matt Kirschenbaum, Cathy Davidson and Bethany Nowiskie; this panel was one of the special sessions related to the conference theme, "Avenues of Access."
  • Michael Berube's Presidential address focused on the precarious place of adjuncts in the profession and the dismal outlook for grad students.  He also talked about disability and disability studies.  All these topics were linked, again, to the "Avenues of Access"  theme.  It was quite moving, and the Q & A featured a lot of folks simply thanking him for shining the spotlight on these issues. 
  • Two good sessions sponsored by the discussion group Libraries and Research in Languages and Literature: a roundtable on "how many copies is enough" re: print collections and a provocative roundtable about joint degrees in library science and literature.
  •  A session that is going to help me with the Crane exhibition, on William Morris and late 19th century arts and crafts publishing.
My sessions were well-attended and I was pleased to get a lot of positive feedback.
  • First, for a panel called "Crossed Codes: Print Dreams of the Digital Age, Digital's Memory of the Age of Print," I gave a paper on extra-illustration largely based on materials at Garrett and the Peabody.  Looks like it will be published in Textual Cultures this fall.  
  • I also organized a "master class" session called "Two Tools for Student-Generated Digital Projects: WordPress and Omeka in the Classroom," in which two practiced user-teachers, Amanda French and George Williams, led hands-on instructional activities to a group of about 50 people new to these technologies.
 Gabrielle Dean